Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A Neumann pressure correction can break tangential no-slip

Statement

On the channel Ω=T×(0,1), with periodic coordinate x∈T=R/Z and wall coordinate y, consider the smooth tentative velocity u~(x,y)=(cos⁡(2πx)y(1−y),0). The field need not be divergence-free; it is zero on both walls. Apply the unit-step pressure projection that solves Δϕ=∇⋅u~,∂yϕ(x,0)=∂yϕ(x,1)=0, periodically in x, and sets u=u~−∇ϕ. The corrected normal velocity is zero at each wall, but its tangential velocity at (0,0) is −2πg(0)≠0, where g(0)=2π(2π)4(2πcoth⁡π−2)>0. Thus this pressure boundary condition does not preserve tangential no-slip for this field. The example asserts no convergence rate.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A periodic channel, the displayed smooth tentative field, the Neumann pressure equation, and the velocity correction u=u~−∇ϕ.

[F1]

The pressure correction considered here is precisely the Poisson problem, homogeneous Neumann wall condition and gradient subtraction written in the statement.

[F2]

The scalar identities Δ(sin⁡(ax)g(y))=sin⁡(ax)(g′′−a2g) and ∂xsin⁡(ax)=acos⁡(ax) follow by differentiation of smooth functions.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2algebra

Write a=c=2π. Direct differentiation gives ∇⋅u~=−csin⁡(ax)y(1−y). Define g(y)=−ca2y2+ca2y−2ca4+ca3sinh⁡(a/2)cosh⁡(a(y−1/2)),ϕ(x,y)=sin⁡(ax)g(y). Differentiating the polynomial and hyperbolic terms gives g′′−a2g=−cy(1−y) and g′(0)=g′(1)=0. By [F2], this ϕ solves the stated Poisson problem and satisfies both Neumann conditions. Since u~y=0 and ∂yϕ=0 at the walls, the corrected normal velocity remains zero.

1.2givenF1F2algebra

For uniqueness of its gradient, if two classical periodic Neumann solutions are given, their difference w is harmonic with ∂yw=0 on both walls. For each fixed y, one-dimensional integration by parts in x gives ∫Twwxx=−∫Twx2 because the periodic endpoint terms cancel; integration by parts in y gives ∫01wwyy=[wwy]01−∫01wy2=−∫01wy2 by the Neumann data. Integrating the latter equality in x and using Δw=0 yields ∫Ω∣∇w∣2=0. Hence ∇w=0, so the correction is independent of the pressure constant.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

Since u~x(x,0)=0, the corrected tangential trace at the lower wall is ux(x,0)=−∂xϕ(x,0)=−acos⁡(ax)g(0). At x=0, g(0)=ca4(acoth⁡(a/2)−2)>0, because coth⁡(a/2)>1 and a=2π>2. Therefore ux(0,0)=−ag(0)≠0, which proves the tangential no-slip defect.

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · 0 levels

Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.

Sources