How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A Neumann pressure correction can break tangential no-slip
Statement
On the channel , with periodic coordinate and wall coordinate , consider the smooth tentative velocity The field need not be divergence-free; it is zero on both walls. Apply the unit-step pressure projection that solves periodically in , and sets . The corrected normal velocity is zero at each wall, but its tangential velocity at is , where Thus this pressure boundary condition does not preserve tangential no-slip for this field. The example asserts no convergence rate.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A periodic channel, the displayed smooth tentative field, the Neumann pressure equation, and the velocity correction .
The pressure correction considered here is precisely the Poisson problem, homogeneous Neumann wall condition and gradient subtraction written in the statement.
The scalar identities and follow by differentiation of smooth functions.
Proof
Write . Direct differentiation gives . Define Differentiating the polynomial and hyperbolic terms gives and . By [F2], this solves the stated Poisson problem and satisfies both Neumann conditions. Since and at the walls, the corrected normal velocity remains zero.
For uniqueness of its gradient, if two classical periodic Neumann solutions are given, their difference is harmonic with on both walls. For each fixed , one-dimensional integration by parts in gives because the periodic endpoint terms cancel; integration by parts in gives by the Neumann data. Integrating the latter equality in and using yields . Hence , so the correction is independent of the pressure constant.
Since , the corrected tangential trace at the lower wall is At , because and . Therefore , which proves the tangential no-slip defect.
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · 0 levels
Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.
Sources
- J. L. Guermond, P. Minev, and J. Shen, An overview of projection methods for incompressible flows (standard reference, not scraped)
- NPTEL, Lecture 5.4: Methods based on Coupling of Pressure and Velocity (standard reference, not scraped)