How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The natural parameter fails at the fold
Example
The equation has a simple fold at . The parameter cannot serve as a two-sided local coordinate for its solution set.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The real equation near .
A simple fold has a unique local Lyapunov–Schmidt chart and nonzero parameter curvature: under the simple fold hypotheses, the normalized curve has and .
Verification
Solving for the parameter gives exactly . At its derivative is , and its second derivative is . Thus the projection from the local solution curve to the -axis has zero derivative at the fold.
For every there is no real solution, while for every there are two, and . Hence no open interval about is the parameter domain of a single-valued local solution graph covering the whole nearby solution set. On either one-sided branch, is unbounded as .
The fold conditions are , , and , so [F1] gives the same nonzero curvature conclusion independently of the explicit graph calculation.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.