How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A noninvertible ideal in a singular one-dimensional domain
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a field, let , and let . Then is a one-dimensional domain that is not Dedekind, and is not an invertible ideal.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , the cusp ring inside , and its maximal ideal .
A nonzero finitely generated fractional ideal is invertible exactly when all maximal localisations are principal (Equivalent characterizations of invertible fractional ideals).
Assuming Choice, injective integral extensions preserve Krull dimension (Injective integral extensions preserve Krull dimension).
Verification
The inclusion is integral because satisfies the monic equation with coefficient . The ring is a one-variable polynomial ring over a field, hence a nonfield principal ideal domain and therefore one-dimensional. Thus [L2] gives . The same monic equation shows that is integral over , but , so is not integrally closed and therefore is not Dedekind.
In the local ring one has . If lay in , we could write with and , so , contradiction. Hence . If were principal, say , then for some . Because , the element is a unit, so . But then implies , impossible: if with and , then would have a linear -term while elements of have no such term. Therefore is not principal.
Since is not principal, [L1] shows that is not invertible.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. P. May, Notes on Dedekind Rings (standard reference, not scraped)