Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A nondiscrete rank-one valuation from incommensurate values

Example

Let Γ=Z+Z2R with the usual order. There is a valuation on a field with value group Γ. The associated valuation ring has rank one but is not discrete.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k and the ordered subgroup Γ=Z+Z2R.

[F1]

A totally ordered abelian group has a translation-invariant total order (Totally ordered abelian groups).

[F2]

A valuation is a map to a totally ordered abelian group adjoined with satisfying the valuation laws (Valuations on a field).

[F3]

A valuation ring is the nonnegative locus of such a valuation (Valuation rings).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

As in the previous example, form the group algebra k[tΓ] and its fraction field K. For a nonzero finite sum f=γΓaγtγ, let v(f) be the least element of its support. The same minimum-support argument as before gives v(fg)=v(f)+v(g) and v(f+g)min{v(f),v(g)}, so extending by v(f/g)=v(f)v(g) and v(0)= yields a valuation on K with value group Γ. Its nonnegative locus is therefore a valuation ring.

F1F2F3givenalgebra
2.1

The ordered group Γ has no least positive element. Indeed, 0<21<1, so any least positive element ε would satisfy 0<ε<1. Choose n=1/ε, so n>1 and 0nε1<ε. Equality nε1=0 would give ε=1/n. But 1/n cannot lie in Γ: if 1/n=a+b2 with a,bZ, then nb2=1na is rational, so b=0 and then na=1, impossible for n>1. Thus 0<nε1<ε, contradicting minimality. Hence the valuation is not discrete.

step 1.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · one level

3 results within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources