Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)↗ rests on later material
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The abstract norming-functional theorem agrees with the concrete L^p-L^q formula

Example

Assume HB (The real dominated-extension principle as an additional hypothesis over ZF ↗). Let (X,A,μ) be a measure space, let 1≤p<∞, and let q be conjugate to p. Assume either 1<p<∞, or p=1 and μ is sigma-finite. For every nonzero f∈Lp(μ), the abstract Hahn-Banach theorem produces a unit-norm functional Φ∈(Lp(μ))∗ with Φ(f)=∥f∥p, and the earlier Lp−Lq duality page realizes the same value concretely by pairing against the usual Lq extremizer.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: HB and a measure space (X,A,μ), an exponent 1≤p<∞ with conjugate exponent q, and a nonzero element f∈Lp(μ) in one of the ranges covered by the Lp−Lq duality page.

[L1]

Under HB, every nonzero vector has a norming functional (Relative dual norming, point separation, and recovery of the norm ↗).

[L2]

In the same Lp−Lq ranges, the Lp norm is the supremum of pairings against unit Lq functions (The Lp norm is the supremum of pairings against unit Lq functions).

[L3]

The bilinear pairing with g defines a bounded scalar-linear functional of norm at most ∥g∥q (Every g∈Lq(μ) defines a bounded linear functional on Lp(μ)).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1L1given

Using the assumed HB, apply [L1] to the nonzero vector f∈Lp(μ). This gives a functional Φ∈(Lp(μ))∗ with ∥Φ∥=1 and Φ(f)=∥f∥p.

1.2L2givenalgebra

By [L2], the same number ∥f∥p is obtained as sup⁡{∣∫fg dμ∣:∥g∥q≤1}. For a representative u of f, put θ(x)=u(x)‾/∣u(x)∣ where u(x)≠0, and θ(x)=0 otherwise. When 1<p<∞, take g=∣u∣p−1θ/∥f∥pp−1. Then ∥g∥q=1 and ug=∣u∣p/∥f∥pp−1, so ∫ug dμ=∥f∥p. When p=1, take g=θ; then ∥g∥∞≤1 and ug=∣u∣. The conjugate phase is required for the bilinear pairing ∫fg over complex scalars; over real scalars it is the usual sign.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2L3∎

By [L3], each displayed g defines a functional of norm at most one, and its value on the nonzero f is ∥f∥p, forcing its operator norm to be exactly one. Thus the abstract existence statement from Hahn-Banach and the concrete Lp−Lq formula from the earlier page identify the same norming phenomenon: one proves that some unit functional attains ∥f∥p, and the other writes an attaining functional down explicitly.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources