How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The function 1 / (1 - z1 z2) extends holomorphically from a Hartogs figure
Example
The function
is holomorphic on the full bidisc and therefore, a fortiori, on every Hartogs figure inside that bidisc.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The function on the unit bidisc.
Every holomorphic function on a Hartogs figure extends uniquely to the full bidisc hull (A holomorphic function on a Hartogs figure extends to the full bidisc).
Verification
On the unit bidisc one has , so . Hence the reciprocal is holomorphic there.
Restricting to any Hartogs figure produces a concrete instance of [L1], and the extension theorem recovers the same global formula on the whole bidisc.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Tasty Bits of Several Complex Variables, §2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)