How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
is not uniformly approximable by polynomials on the unit circle
Example
Let for . The function on the unit circle is not the uniform limit there of any sequence of polynomials.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The unit-circle contour and the function on .
Every polynomial has a global primitive, so its integral around a closed contour is (The line integral of a continuous function admitting a primitive is that primitive's endpoint increment along every rectifiable path).
The exponential parametrizes the unit circle (Complex sine, cosine, hyperbolic sine, and hyperbolic cosine from the complex exponential).
Verification
Suppose polynomials converge uniformly to on . Then contour integration along the fixed rectifiable contour preserves the limit, so .
By [L1], every is . But [L2] gives . This contradiction shows that no such polynomial sequence exists.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Guide to Cultivating Complex Analysis, Exercise 9.1.2 (standard reference, not scraped)