How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exact star discrepancy of the center point
Example
For an integer , let be the singleton configuration with . Its star discrepancy is . Thus the exact values are in dimension two and in dimension three.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer and the singleton configuration . Compute using the half-open anchored-box convention.
Star discrepancy, digital nets, and digital sequences: A point multiset is an ordered list in , repetitions are counted with multiplicity, and is the supremum over of the absolute difference between the fraction of listed points in and its volume .
Verification
For , the point lies in exactly when for every , because the box is half-open. The point count is therefore one if all these inequalities hold and zero otherwise.
If some , the count is zero, so the discrepancy is . Since , , so this case contributes less than .
If every , the count is one and the discrepancy is . The product exceeds , so this value is less than .
For each integer , the box endpoint lies in and has discrepancy . Thus the supremum is at least , while steps 2.1–2.2 bound every box error above by this value; hence . Substitution gives for and for .
Remarks
The finite calculation is proved only from the definition; it is not an asymptotic-rate claim. For context, Owen reports the planar order and, for fixed , a classical Roth lower baseline alongside a known construction upper order . The cited lower bound is not presented as the strongest known lower bound. Dick's version 3 result concerns uniform growing-dimension tractability, and Remark 1.4 keeps fixed dimension separate. These source-reported comparisons do not prove a matching lower bound or resolve the open question.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Art B. Owen, Practical Quasi-Monte Carlo, Chapter 15, printed pp. 17–19 and Theorem 15.7 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Josef Dick, Optimal Polynomial Tractability Exponents for the Inverse Star Discrepancy, arXiv:2607.23571v3 (standard reference, not scraped)