How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An entropy-stable Burgers flux still smears an under-resolved shock
Example
For the Burgers flux and quadratic entropy, the unit-dissipation entropy-stable flux has a negative Tadmor residual at the entropy shock . On the four-cell periodic data and with , one explicit forward-Euler update replaces the two states adjacent to that jump by and . Thus semidiscrete entropy stability coexists with visible shock smearing at this coarse resolution. This computation gives no fully-discrete entropy inequality for forward Euler.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Burgers' flux , the entropy-stable flux from the preceding example, the four periodic cell states, and . Verify entropy admissibility of the exact shock, the semidiscrete flux residual, and the displayed finite update.
Tadmor entropy-conservative two-point flux: consistency and define entropy conservation.
Semidiscrete cell entropy inequality for Tadmor-dissipative fluxes: this flux gives the semidiscrete cell entropy inequality, not a fully discrete time-step claim.
Verification
The Rankine–Hugoniot speed from states is . Since , it is a compressive shock. Its entropy production is , so it satisfies the quadratic entropy inequality.
The entropy-conservative Burgers flux is : it is symmetric and diagonal-consistent, and , so [F2] applies. Hence and [F3] gives . With and from step 1.1, the Tadmor residual is .
Equal-state faces have flux and by [F2]–[F3]. Thus the left state adjacent to the jump updates to , and the right state updates to . The jump is spread over two intermediate values. This is a finite computation only; [F4] does not certify the forward-Euler step's entropy inequality. The interface flux value was obtained in step 2.1.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- E. Tadmor, Entropy Stable Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws, Handbook of Numerical Methods for Hyperbolic Problems, Vol. 17 (standard reference, not scraped)
- R. Bürger, P. E. Méndez, and C. Parés, On Entropy Stable Schemes for Degenerate Parabolic Multispecies Kinematic Flow Models (standard reference, not scraped)