Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An entropy-stable Burgers flux still smears an under-resolved shock

Example

For the Burgers flux and quadratic entropy, the unit-dissipation entropy-stable flux has a negative Tadmor residual at the entropy shock 1→0. On the four-cell periodic data (1,1,0,0) and with ν=Δt/Δx=1/2, one explicit forward-Euler update replaces the two states adjacent to that jump by 11/12 and 1/3. Thus semidiscrete entropy stability coexists with visible shock smearing at this coarse resolution. This computation gives no fully-discrete entropy inequality for forward Euler.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Burgers' flux f(u)=u2/2, the entropy-stable flux from the preceding example, the four periodic cell states, and ν=1/2. Verify entropy admissibility of the exact shock, the semidiscrete flux residual, and the displayed finite update.

[F1]

Convex entropy pairs, entropy variables, and entropy potentials for systems: for η=u2/2 and q=u3/3, v=u and ψ=u3/6.

[F2]

Tadmor entropy-conservative two-point flux: consistency and [v]fec=[ψ] define entropy conservation.

[F3]
[F4]

Semidiscrete cell entropy inequality for Tadmor-dissipative fluxes: this flux gives the semidiscrete cell entropy inequality, not a fully discrete time-step claim.

Verification

1.1givenF1algebra

The Rankine–Hugoniot speed from states uL=1,uR=0 is (f(0)−f(1))/(0−1)=1/2. Since f′(0)=0<1/2<1=f′(1), it is a compressive shock. Its entropy production is q(0)−q(1)−12(η(0)−η(1))=−1/3+1/4=−1/12<0, so it satisfies the quadratic entropy inequality.

2.1givenF1F2F3step 1.1algebra

The entropy-conservative Burgers flux is fec=(uL2+uLuR+uR2)/6: it is symmetric and diagonal-consistent, and (uR−uL)fec=(uR3−uL3)/6=[ψ], so [F2] applies. Hence fec(1,0)=1/6 and [F3] gives fes(1,0)=2/3. With [u]=−1 and [ψ]=−1/6 from step 1.1, the Tadmor residual is [u]fes−[ψ]=−2/3+1/6=−1/2<0.

3.1givenF1F2F3F4step 2.1algebra∎

Equal-state faces have flux fes(1,1)=1/2 and fes(0,0)=0 by [F2]–[F3]. Thus the left state adjacent to the jump updates to 1−12(2/3−1/2)=11/12, and the right state updates to 0−12(0−2/3)=1/3. The jump is spread over two intermediate values. This is a finite computation only; [F4] does not certify the forward-Euler step's entropy inequality. The interface flux value was obtained in step 2.1.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources