How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The two-subset model reproduces the Petersen spectrum
Example
The Petersen graph, realised on the two-element subsets of a five-element set, has adjacency spectrum .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Petersen graph on for a five-element set .
This graph is the Petersen graph exactly when adjacency means disjointness of the two-element subsets (The Petersen graph on the two-element subsets of a five-element set, adjacent when disjoint).
The Petersen graph has adjacency spectrum (The Petersen graph has adjacency spectrum ).
Verification
By [F1], the displayed two-subset construction is precisely the Petersen graph, not merely an isomorphic copy under a different naming convention.
Therefore [L1] applies directly and yields the spectrum .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Steve Butler, Spectral Graph Theory course notes, lecture 9 (standard reference, not scraped)