How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Picard iteration for , , recovers the exponential series
Example
For and , start from . The Picard iterates are
and converge uniformly on every bounded interval to , the unique solution.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The scalar Picard operator .
The iterates converge to uniformly on every bounded interval (Picard iteration from produces the exponential partial sums).
Picard-Lindelöf gives a unique local solution of the IVP (Picard-Lindelöf local existence and uniqueness for first-order systems).
Verification
The cited construction gives , beginning with , and [L1] gives compact-uniform convergence to .
The limit satisfies the Picard equation, and [L2] identifies it with the unique solution of , .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gerald Teschl, Ordinary Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems, Ch. 2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jiri Lebl, Basic Analysis I, Section 6.3 (standard reference, not scraped)