Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Riemann–Hurwitz for the sphere power map

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice. For every n≥1 the power map f:C^→C^,f(z)=zn (z∈C),f(∞)=∞, is a holomorphic map of the Riemann sphere of degree n, with e0(f)=n, e∞(f)=n and ez(f)=1 for every z∈C×. Riemann–Hurwitz for f therefore reads −2=−2n+2(n−1), both sides equal to −2, with the genus of the sphere equal to 0. For n=1 the map is the identity, all indices equal 1, and there is no ramification.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integer n≥1 and the map f(z)=zn on C, f(∞)=∞.

[F1]

The standard charts of C^ are ϕ0(z)=z on U0=C^∖{∞} and ϕ∞(z)=1/z on U∞=C^∖{0}, with transition w↦1/w on the overlap (The standard holomorphic charts on the Riemann sphere, with holomorphy and poles at infinity); these charts make C^ a Riemann surface (Atlases on the sphere, plane, disc and annulus) that is compact Hausdorff, being the one-point compactification of C (The Riemann sphere is the published one-point compactification of the complex plane).

[F2]

A map of Riemann surfaces is holomorphic when its chart expressions are holomorphic; in the standard charts a map fixing ∞ is holomorphic at infinity exactly when the expression u↦1/f(1/u) is holomorphic at 0 (Holomorphic maps and meromorphic functions on Riemann surfaces, The standard holomorphic charts on the Riemann sphere, with holomorphy and poles at infinity).

[F3]

A complex polynomial P(z)=∑kakzk is entire with P′(z)=∑kkakzk−1 (Complex polynomials are entire with the power-rule derivative, and rational functions are holomorphic wherever their denominator is nonzero); in particular z↦zn is entire with derivative nzn−1, which vanishes only at z=0 when n≥2 and nowhere when n=1.

[F4]

Ramification index: ex(f) is the unique e≥1 with the chart expression z↦ze in suitable centred charts, and ex(f)=1 exactly when f is a local biholomorphism at x; x is a critical point when ex(f)>1 and f(x) is then a branch value (Ramification index, ramification order and branch value, Biholomorphic maps between complex domains).

[F5]

Degree of a proper nonconstant holomorphic map: it is onto with finite fibres and has a degree d=∑x∈f−1(y)ex(f) independent of y (Degree of a proper holomorphic map of Riemann surfaces).

[F6]

For w≠0 the equation zn=w has exactly n distinct solutions, the n-th roots of w; the n-th roots of unity are exactly exp⁡(2πik/n), 0≤k<n (The n-th roots of a complex number and the n distinct roots of unity for every n≥1).

[F7]

Stereographic projection identifies the Riemann sphere C^ homeomorphically with S2 (Stereographic projection identifies the Riemann sphere with the unit two-sphere); by the genus definition, g(C^)=0 and χ(C^)=2 (Genus and Euler characteristic of a compact Riemann surface).

[F8]

Riemann–Hurwitz: for a nonconstant holomorphic map f:X→Y of compact connected Riemann surfaces of degree d, 2g(X)−2=d(2g(Y)−2)+∑x∈X(ex(f)−1) (Riemann–Hurwitz formula for compact Riemann surfaces).

[F9]

The Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F2F3

(f is a holomorphic nonconstant self-map of the sphere.) In the chart ϕ0 the expression of f is z↦zn, entire by [F3]; at infinity, using the source chart u=1/z and the target chart v=1/f(z), the expression is v=un for u≠0, which extends holomorphically to u=0 with value 0=ϕ∞(f(∞)); hence f is holomorphic on C^ by [F2]. It is nonconstant: for n=1 it is the identity and for n≥2 the values 0 and 1 differ.

1.2F1F5

(f is proper.) C^ is compact and f is continuous [F1]; for every compact K⊆C^ the preimage f−1(K) is closed in the compact space C^, hence compact. Thus [F5] applies to f.

1.3F3F4

(The ramification indices.) At 0 the centred charts are the standard charts near 0, and the chart expression is z↦zn, so e0(f)=n by [F4]. At ∞ the centred charts (u,1/u) on the source and (v,1/w) on the target give the expression u↦un, so e∞(f)=n; for n=1 both statements read e=1 and there is no critical point. For a∈C× the chart expression near a is z↦zn with derivative nzn−1 nonzero at a by [F3], so f is a local biholomorphism at a and ea(f)=1 by [F4]; such a is therefore not a critical point.

2.1F5F6step 1.3

(The degree is n.) By [F5] and step 1.2 the degree equals ∑x∈f−1(1)ex(f). The solutions of zn=1 are the n distinct n-th roots of unity, all in C×, by [F6]; each has index 1 by step 1.3, so d=n.

3.1F7F8step 1.3step 2.1

(Riemann–Hurwitz reads −2=−2n+2(n−1).) Apply [F8] to f, which is nonconstant holomorphic of degree d=n between compact connected Riemann surfaces by steps 1.1, 1.2 and 2.1: 2g(C^)−2=n(2g(C^)−2)+∑x(ex(f)−1). By the stereographic homeomorphism and genus definition in [F7], g(C^)=0. For n≥2, step 1.3 gives exactly two ramification points, 0 and ∞, each with e=n, so the sum is 2(n−1); for n=1 there is no ramification and the empty sum is also 2(n−1)=0. Substituting gives −2=−2n+2(n−1), an identity of integers.

4.1F7F8F9step 3.1∎

(Conclusion and choice.) All indices, the degree and the ramification sum are computed from the explicit charts, so this example is choice-free; the Axiom of Choice is inherited only through the genus interface [F7] used in [F8], as [F9] records.

Remarks

The power map is the simplest nontrivial Riemann–Hurwitz identity: for n≥2 the two critical points 0 and ∞ each contribute n−1, so the total deficit is 2(n−1), and in Euler-characteristic form the count gives χ=d χ(C^)−∑(ex−1)=2n−2(n−1)=2, the Euler characteristic of a sphere again — as it must be, since the source is the sphere. Criticality is independent of the coordinate choices: at both 0 and ∞, centred source and target coordinates give the same local model u↦un, with ramification index n. For the same computation in the general P1 setting with the local model z↦zn see morphism projective line power map; the present example stays in the sphere charts used throughout this pair.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

58 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources