How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Prime factorisation in quadratic fields
Example
In , the ideal splits, is inert, and ramifies, where each parenthesized expression denotes a principal ideal.
Verification
Given: .
In , as elements, hence as ideals. The quotient by is via , and the quotient by is via : in either quotient eliminate , leaving the relation . Thus both factors are prime of residue degree one. They are distinct, since maps to in the second quotient.
The quotient is , a field of nine elements since has no root in . Thus is itself prime with residue degree two.
Finally as elements, and is a unit, so as ideals. The quotient is by substituting , so is prime with residue degree one. These explicit ideal products and residue fields give respectively ; ; and . They satisfy the degree-two fundamental identity and the definitions of split, inert, and ramified.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Number Theory, Example 3.44 (standard reference, not scraped)