How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A nilpotent irrelevant ideal gives empty Proj
Example
Let be a field and let be graded by and , so that and with . Then is a nilpotent ideal, , and yet is nonempty: the ring has the single prime ideal . So emptiness of Proj is not emptiness of the spectrum, and it is detected by the nilpotency of the irrelevant ideal.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , the graded ring with .
is the set of homogeneous prime ideals with ; a prime contains every nilpotent element; and with and for . (Points of Proj of a graded ring)
if and only if every homogeneous element of is nilpotent; if is finitely generated this is equivalent to being nilpotent. (Empty Proj and irrelevant torsion)
In the ring every prime ideal contains , so is the unique prime, and it is maximal; the localisation is the zero ring. [algebra]
Verification
The irrelevant ideal is nilpotent. Here consists of the multiples of , and ; hence every element of is nilpotent and is finitely generated.
The standard chart is empty. For the homogeneous element of degree we have , and because is nilpotent; hence , and since generates this is the only standard open.
Proj is empty. By step 1.1 every homogeneous element of is nilpotent, so [F2] gives ; equivalently, any homogeneous prime contains the nilpotent , hence contains and is excluded from .
The spectrum is nonempty. In the element is nilpotent but nonzero, so the ideal is proper; every prime contains the nilpotent , so is the unique prime ideal and , in contrast with step 2.1.
Conclusion. Steps 1.1 and 2.1 show that the nilpotent irrelevant ideal produces empty Proj, while step 3.1 shows that the underlying ring still has a point; the two conclusions are consistent because Proj discards exactly the primes containing all of . [F1, F2, step 2.1, step 3.1] \qed
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Constructions of Schemes, Sections 27.8-27.21 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea, 29 August 2022, Sections 4.5, 7.4, 9.3, 10.6, 17.4, 17.6, 18.2 (standard reference, not scraped)