Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A projective hypersurface as a homogeneous quotient

Example

Let k be a field, n≥0 and let 0≠F∈k[x0,…,xn] be homogeneous of degree e≥1. Then Proj⁡(k[x0,…,xn]/(F))=V+(F)↪Pkn is the closed subscheme of the projective space cut out by F, and on the standard chart D+(xi) its coordinate ring is k[xa/xi:a≠i]/(F/xie). The description includes the degenerate cases: for n=0 one has F=cx0e with c≠0 and the chart ring k/(c)=0, so V+(F)=∅.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, an integer n≥0, the graded polynomial ring B=k[x0,…,xn] with deg⁡xi=1, a nonzero homogeneous F∈B of degree e≥1, and the homogeneous principal ideal I=(F)⊆B.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice states that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F1]

For a commutative ring A, a homogeneous ideal I⊆A[x0,…,xn] determines a closed subscheme V+(I)↪PAn whose intersection with the chart D+(xi) is Spec⁡(B(xi)/I(xi)), where I(xi)=(I[xi−1])0; equivalently V+(I)=Proj⁡(B/I) under the canonical closed immersion Proj⁡(B/I)→Proj⁡B=PAn. (Closed subschemes of projective space and saturated ideals)

[F2]

There is a canonical isomorphism Proj⁡A[x0,…,xn]≅PAn over Spec⁡A, and over the field k the standard chart D+(xi) has coordinate ring k[xa(i):a≠i] with xa(i)=xa/xi. (Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring, Closed subschemes of projective space and saturated ideals)

Verification

technique · direct: read the hypersurface off the homogeneous quotient theorem, compute the degree-zero localisation of the principal ideal at each chart variable, and identify the resulting equation with $F/x_i^{e}$
1.1A1F1F2

The quotient and the closed subscheme. Since F is homogeneous, I=(F) is a homogeneous ideal, so by [F1] the subscheme V+(I)↪Pkn exists and equals Proj⁡(B/I)=Proj⁡(k[x0,…,xn]/(F)); by [F2] the ambient space Proj⁡B is Pkn with charts D+(xi).

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

The chart ring. Fix i. By [F2] the chart ring of Pkn on D+(xi) is B(xi)=k[xa(i):a≠i] with xa(i)=xa/xi. In the localisation B[xi−1] the element xi is a unit and F=xie⋅(F/xie), so the ideal generated by F is generated by the degree-zero element F/xie; hence I(xi)=(I[xi−1])0=(F/xie), and the chart ring of V+(I) on D+(xi) is B(xi)/I(xi)=k[xa(i):a≠i]/(F/xie), that is, k[xa/xi:a≠i]/(F/xideg⁡F).

3.1

Conclusion and degenerate cases. Steps 1.1 and 2.1 identify Proj⁡(k[x0,…,xn]/(F)) with V+(F)⊆Pkn and compute its chart rings. If F=cxie is a nonzero multiple of a single coordinate power, then on the i-th chart the equation is the unit c and the chart ring is k[xa(i)]/(c)=0, so that chart meets V+(F) in the empty scheme; in particular for n=0 one has F=cx0e and V+(F)=Spec⁡0=∅, the empty hypersurface. If F is not such a monomial then for every i the element F/xie is the dehomogenisation of F, a nonzero element of the polynomial ring k[xa(i):a≠i] that is not a unit because some monomial of F has a positive exponent at a variable other than xi; each chart is then the genuine affine hypersurface k[xa(i)]/(F/xie), which is a nonzero ring. The zero polynomial is excluded by hypothesis. The Axiom of Choice [A1] is inherited from the affine quotient and gluing suppliers of [F1]; no choice is made here. [A1, F1, F2, step 1.1, step 2.1, cases: empty chart and n=0] \qed

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources