How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A projective hypersurface as a homogeneous quotient
Example
Let be a field, and let be homogeneous of degree . Then is the closed subscheme of the projective space cut out by , and on the standard chart its coordinate ring is The description includes the degenerate cases: for one has with and the chart ring , so .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , an integer , the graded polynomial ring with , a nonzero homogeneous of degree , and the homogeneous principal ideal .
The Axiom of Choice states that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function. (The Axiom of Choice)
For a commutative ring , a homogeneous ideal determines a closed subscheme whose intersection with the chart is , where ; equivalently under the canonical closed immersion . (Closed subschemes of projective space and saturated ideals)
There is a canonical isomorphism over , and over the field the standard chart has coordinate ring with . (Projective space is Proj of a polynomial ring, Closed subschemes of projective space and saturated ideals)
Verification
The quotient and the closed subscheme. Since is homogeneous, is a homogeneous ideal, so by [F1] the subscheme exists and equals ; by [F2] the ambient space is with charts .
The chart ring. Fix . By [F2] the chart ring of on is with . In the localisation the element is a unit and , so the ideal generated by is generated by the degree-zero element ; hence , and the chart ring of on is , that is, .
Conclusion and degenerate cases. Steps 1.1 and 2.1 identify with and compute its chart rings. If is a nonzero multiple of a single coordinate power, then on the -th chart the equation is the unit and the chart ring is , so that chart meets in the empty scheme; in particular for one has and , the empty hypersurface. If is not such a monomial then for every the element is the dehomogenisation of , a nonzero element of the polynomial ring that is not a unit because some monomial of has a positive exponent at a variable other than ; each chart is then the genuine affine hypersurface , which is a nonzero ring. The zero polynomial is excluded by hypothesis. The Axiom of Choice [A1] is inherited from the affine quotient and gluing suppliers of [F1]; no choice is made here. [A1, F1, F2, step 1.1, step 2.1, cases: empty chart and n=0] \qed
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Constructions of Schemes, Sections 27.8-27.21 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ravi Vakil, The Rising Sea, 29 August 2022, Sections 4.5, 7.4, 9.3, 10.6, 17.4, 17.6, 18.2 (standard reference, not scraped)