How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Improper equivalence can merge two distinct proper classes
Example
If one allows determinant substitutions as well as determinant substitutions, then the two distinct reduced forms
become equivalent.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The forms and .
Proper equivalence uses determinant-one integer matrices (Proper equivalence of binary quadratic forms).
The previous counterexample shows that and are not properly equivalent (Distinct reduced forms can represent the same integers).
Verification
The matrix has determinant , and direct substitution gives .
Thus allowing determinant merges the two distinct proper classes from [L1]: the forms are equivalent under a unimodular substitution, but not under a determinant-one unimodular substitution.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Andrew Granville, Binary Quadratic Forms, Chapter 4 (standard reference, not scraped)