How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The quaternion group as a cocycle central extension of C2 x C2
Example
Let with and . The group of The quaternion group inside the nonzero quaternions satisfies with , so . Its faithful two-dimensional complex representation restricts to a projective representation of whose factor set is nontrivial: the lifts of the two generators anticommute, . The subgroup of the cocycle central extension formed by the elements with second coordinate is isomorphic to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The group with , , and the matrices , , in .
has , , and , and is central. (The quaternion group inside the nonzero quaternions).
For a normalized two-cocycle on the set with is a group in which is central with quotient . (The twisted product of a normalized cocycle is a central extension).
Projective -representations with factor set correspond to representations of with , by and . (The cocycle central extension linearizes a projective representation).
The factor set of a normalized projective representation satisfies and the two-cocycle identity. (The factor set satisfies the two-cocycle equation, Projective representations and normalized factor sets).
For an abelian group , every two-coboundary is symmetric in , since .
Verification
Direct computation gives , , and , so the eight matrices are distinct and form a subgroup . Listing them, have second columns up to sign, so no two of the eight coincide; the assignment , , , preserves the relations of [F1], so with centre and quotient via , .
Define by for ; this is well defined because every element of is uniquely . Step 1.1 further gives , , and . Hence, using , the products on basis elements are , , , , , , , , , and . Comparing with in shows for all , where , and .
The function is a normalized two-cocycle: comparing with using step 2.1 and cancelling the invertible matrix gives for all , and holds by definition, matching [F4].
The cocycle central extension of [F2] contains the eight elements ; the map with , , , satisfies , because by step 2.1; it is injective on the eight elements and its image is , so . Also is faithful, since forces by the distinctness of the eight matrices in step 1.1.
The factor set is not a coboundary, so its class in is nonzero: if for some , then [A1] would give , contradicting from step 2.1. Consequently the lifts of the two generators anticommute, , the representation of step 2.1 is a faithful projective representation of with nontrivial factor set, and it corresponds by [F3] to the representation of whose restriction to is the faithful two-dimensional representation of .
The example is complete: by step 1.1, the faithful two-dimensional representation of restricts on to the projective representation of step 2.1 whose factor set has and is therefore not a coboundary by step 5.1, and the -valued subgroup of the cocycle central extension is isomorphic to by step 4.1.
Depends on
- The twisted product of a normalized cocycle is a central extension
- The cocycle central extension linearizes a projective representation
- The quaternion group $Q_8=\{\pm1,\pm i,\pm j,\pm k\}$ inside the nonzero quaternions
- The factor set satisfies the two-cocycle equation
- Projective representations and normalized factor sets
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Britta Späth, Reduction theorems for some global-local conjectures — Proposition 1.11 and Theorem 1.12, printed pp. 4–5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Tammo tom Dieck, Representation Theory — §4.2, printed pp. 54–57 (standard reference, not scraped)