Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exact estimation of a binary phase

Example

Take a valid eigenphase-estimation input with m=3 and eigenphase θ=5/8. Compute the complete output law and the returned estimate.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A valid QPE eigenpair Uψ=exp⁡(2πi(5/8))ψ, with m=3.

[F1]

The algorithm returns the measured label y and estimate y/Q, where Q=2m (Quantum phase estimation).

[F2]

If Qθ=t is an integer, then the exact-grid theorem gives probability one to y=t and zero to every other label (Exact phase recovery on the QPE grid).

Verification

1.1givenF2algebra

Here Q=23=8 and Qθ=8(5/8)=5, an integer in {0,…,7}. By [F2], the output probabilities in label order 0,1,…,7 are (0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0).

2.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

The unique measured label is y=5; [F1] therefore returns the exact phase estimate y/Q=5/8.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

41 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources