How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Two-qubit QSD CNOT upper-bound instance
Example
Substituting n=2 into the stated no-ancilla QSD count gives (23/48)·16−(3/2)·4+4/3=3 CNOTs, with one-qubit gates counted separately.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the no-ancilla QSD CNOT bound for n=2.
QSD CNOT Upper Bound proves the no-ancilla CNOT upper bound. At its supplier uses the three-CNOT base case, so neither recursive optimization is needed.
Verification
Substitute in [A1]. The bound is CNOTs.
The conclusion counts CNOTs only. One-qubit gates and classical compile time are separate resources, so this substitution supplies neither a total gate count nor a compilation-time estimate.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Shende, Bullock, and Markov, Synthesis of Quantum Logic Circuits (standard reference, not scraped)
- Andrew M. Childs, Lecture Notes on Quantum Algorithms (standard reference, not scraped)