Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Radical and nilradical of the affine Lie algebra

Example

Let k have characteristic zero and let a=kxky with [x,y]=y. Then

rad(a)=a,nilrad(a)=ky.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The displayed two-dimensional Lie algebra over a characteristic-zero field.

[L1]

The radical is the largest solvable ideal (Solvable radical).

[L2]

The nilradical is the largest nilpotent ideal in characteristic zero (Nilradical).

[L3]

The affine algebra is solvable and not nilpotent (The two-dimensional affine Lie algebra is solvable, not nilpotent).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

By [L3], a is solvable. It is an ideal of itself, so the universal property [L1] gives rad(a)=a.

L1L3
1.2

The line ky is an ideal because [x,y]=y and [y,y]=0. It is abelian and therefore nilpotent, so [L2] gives kynilrad(a).

L2givenalgebra
1.3

Let I be an ideal not contained in ky. It contains a vector v=ax+by with a0. Since I is an ideal, [v,y]=ay lies in I, whence yI; then x=a1(vby)I. Thus I=a, which is not nilpotent by [L3]. Consequently every nilpotent ideal is contained in ky.

L3givenalgebra
2.1

Step 1.2 shows that ky is a nilpotent ideal, and step 1.3 shows that it contains every nilpotent ideal. The universal property [L2] therefore gives nilrad(a)=ky. Together with step 1.1 this proves both displayed identities. The only division is by the explicitly nonzero scalar a; no choice principle is used.

L2step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources