Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A pick-freeze ratio can be biased at finite sample size

Example

Take one input X∼Bernoulli⁡(1/2) and f(X)=X. The true first-order Sobol index is 1. With two rows of Pick-freeze Monte Carlo estimators for Sobol indices, conditional on the algorithm returning an index (its empirical variance denominator is positive), the expected reported ratio is 5/6. Thus unbiased numerator and denominator estimators do not make their ratio unbiased.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The one-factor Bernoulli model and two independent rows of the stated pick-freeze bundle.

[F1]

Pick-freeze Monte Carlo estimators for Sobol indices: the one-factor numerator is N=f(X)f(X)−f(U)f(V) and the independent-pair denominator is D=12(f(W)−f(W′))2; the ratio Nˉ/Dˉ is returned when the sample mean Dˉ>0.

[F2]

Pick-freeze covariances recover first and total Sobol numerators: the population first-order numerator and variance denominator are both V{1} and V.

[F3]

First-order and total Sobol indices: S1=V{1}/V when V>0.

Verification

Given: The model and algorithm convention in the Example.

1.1F2F3givenalgebra

Since EX=1/2 and Var⁡(X)=1/4, the only ANOVA component is f{1}=X−1/2, so V{1}=V=1/4 and [F3] gives the true index S1=1.

1.2F1givenalgebra

In each row r, the first-order hybrid equals Xr, so Nr=Xr−UrVr and ENr=1/4. Also Dr=1/2 exactly when Wr≠Wr′, an event of probability 1/2, and is zero otherwise. All numerator draws are independent of all denominator draws. If K is the number of positive denominators in the two rows, then K∼Binomial⁡(2,1/2) and is independent of N1+N2.

2.1F1F2step 1.1step 1.2algebra∎

On the return event K>0, Dˉ=K/4 and Nˉ=(N1+N2)/2. Independence and E[N1+N2]=1/2 give E[Nˉ/Dˉ∣K]=1/K. Since P(K=1∣K>0)=2/3 and P(K=2∣K>0)=1/3, the conditional reported-ratio expectation is 2/3+(1/3)(1/2)=5/6, different from the population index 1 in step 1.1. Each Nr and Dr remains unbiased for 1/4, but their ratio is biased when returned.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources