How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Reduced QR avoids the condition-number squaring seen in the normal equations
Example
Let Then already has reduced QR factorisation with and . The least-squares solution is , while and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The displayed matrix , vector , and reduced QR factorisation.
Reduced QR solves full-column-rank least squares through and avoids the condition-number square of the normal equations (Reduced QR over the reals solves full-column-rank least squares without squaring the condition number).
Verification
The columns of are already orthogonal, so and form a reduced QR factorisation. Also .
Solving gives and , hence . The factor has spectral condition number , whereas has spectral condition number . This is exactly the contrast described in [L1].
Steps 1.1-2.1 verify the example.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Tobin A. Driscoll and Richard J. Braun, Fundamentals of Numerical Computation, Section 3.3.3 and Example 3.3.2 (standard reference, not scraped)