How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Reducing the word leaves the reduced word
Example
For distinct letters in an alphabet , the word
is freely equivalent to the reduced word .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Distinct letters in an alphabet .
An elementary cancellation deletes adjacent pairs and , and a word is reduced exactly when no such pair occurs (Words in an alphabet with formal inverses, elementary cancellation, and reduced words).
Freely equivalent words are connected by finitely many elementary cancellations and reverse insertions (Words in an alphabet with formal inverses, elementary cancellation, and reduced words).
Verification
Delete the initial adjacent pair to obtain .
Delete the initial adjacent pair in the resulting word to obtain .
The one-letter word has no adjacent pair and is reduced, while steps 1.1 and 2.1 are a finite cancellation sequence; hence the two words are freely equivalent.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- M. Brittenham, Group Presentations, Class Notes (standard reference, not scraped)