Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

How universal regularity excludes the classical Choice pathologies

Example

Compare the four distinct obstruction calculations.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Universal LM and PSP in the Solovay model.

[F1]

The Solovay model has no Vitali or Bernstein set: supplies the translate and perfect-set contradictions.

[F2]

The Solovay model has no Hamel basis and no discontinuous additive real function: supplies the kernel and bounded-level-set contradictions.

Verification

1.1

For a Vitali selector, rational translates are disjoint: measure zero makes their countable cover null, and positive measure makes finitely many translates exceed a containing interval.

assume-case 1F1
1.2

For a Bernstein set, it and its complement contain no perfect subset; at least one is uncountable, contradicting PSP.

assume-case 2F1
1.3

For a Hamel basis, one coefficient kernel is a proper measurable subgroup: positive measure makes it all of R, while measure zero makes its rational-coset cover null.

assume-case 3F2
1.4

For an additive map, a positive-measure bounded level set exists; Steinhaus makes the map bounded near zero and hence continuous and linear.

assume-case 4F2
1.5

These are exactly the four named cases and use, respectively, translation invariance, PSP, subgroup rigidity, and Cauchy regularity; only countable ideal closure uses DC.

cases-exhaustive
2.1

The comparison follows in all four cases.

cases: step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 1.4step 1.5

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.