Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Work and storage counts for an M-node SDC sweep

Example

For M nodes and a budget of K complete explicit-left-Euler SDC sweeps, consider a run that passes the preliminary checks and completes predictor evaluation. Evaluate and retain all M right-hand-side values at the constant predictor. Each completed sweep evaluates M new stage values and reuses the previous stage values. The tableau and preconditioner are set up once.

When K=0, the predictor values are still evaluated, but no residual test is run; the procedure returns iteration-budget-exhausted with no accepted endpoint.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite SDC algorithm with M≥1 stages and integer budget K≥0.

[F1]

Finite explicit-left-Euler spectral deferred-correction sweep: evaluate and cache the predictor derivatives, reuse old derivatives during each sweep, and apply the stated finite-budget and residual branches.

[F2]

Stage-call, storage and arithmetic bounds for a finite SDC execution: after predictor evaluation and s completed sweeps with no incomplete sweep, the stage-call count is M(s+1); all runs use at most M(K+1) instructed stage calls. Coefficients need O(M2) storage, stage/derivative buffers need O(Md), and a dense sweep needs O(M2d) scalar arithmetic, subject to the lemma's work model and exclusions.

Verification

1.1F1F2algebra

With K=0, the algorithm evaluates and stores the M predictor derivatives, then returns iteration-budget-exhausted without an accepted endpoint. If the run stops after s>0 completed sweeps with no incomplete sweep, each adds exactly M evaluations because its M new stage states are evaluated once and the previous F(Uj) values are reused. Thus the total is M+sM=M(s+1), and for s≤K this is at most M(K+1), attained if all K sweeps complete. A failed run with a partially evaluated sweep is counted by its actual prefix as in [F2], and still obeys that bound. Acceptance after s≥1 sweeps returns Us−1 and uses its cached endpoint derivatives with no additional calls.

2.1F1F2givenalgebra∎

The stored dense matrices Q,QΔ each have M2 real entries, so their storage is O(M2); retaining old/current stage vectors and their derivative values takes O(Md) additional scalar storage. Each forward-recursion stage has two sums with at most 2M vector terms in total, for at most O(M2d) scalar arithmetic per sweep. Residual formation adds O(Md) scalar arithmetic and at most M square roots; an accepted endpoint adds O(Md) arithmetic and no new field evaluations. These are the proved counts in [F2]. They omit the cost of evaluating f, constructing the polynomial quadrature data (which depends on their representation), supplied predictor generation, and external admissibility/invariance certification and their internal storage. The model uses exact real arithmetic and gives no floating-point roundoff guarantee.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources