How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
First- and second-moment bounds for a nonempty Bernoulli random subset
Example
Retain each element of independently with probability , and let be the size of the random subset. Then When , the first- and second-moment bounds give
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Naturals and a real .
is a sum of mutually independent Bernoulli variables, and mutual independence factors their joint attained-value probabilities (Bernoulli random variables and binomial random variables as sums of independent Bernoulli trials, Pairwise and mutual independence of finite-valued random variables).
Expectation is linear on finite sums on the finite retention probability space. (Expectation is linear for every finite family of random variables, without any independence hypothesis)
Each retention indicator has expectation equal to its event probability; the product of two indicators is the indicator of their intersection. (Indicators turn event probabilities, intersections, and finite counts into expectations and products)
Markov and the second-moment theorem give their respective upper and lower bounds (Markov's inequality on a finite probability space, The finite second-moment bound when ).
Verification
The event means every retention coordinate is zero, so .
Write for the indicator that element is retained, so . By [L3], and ; for distinct , [L1] and [L3] give . Finite linearity [L2] therefore gives , and expanding the finite square gives There are ordered distinct pairs; when or that pair sum is empty.
If , then or , and almost surely; all three displayed exact formulas give zero where appropriate, while the second-moment ratio is not formed.
If , Markov at threshold gives , and the second-moment bound with steps 1.1 and 1.2 gives .
The cases are exhaustive. At and , the exact probability is and the second-moment lower bound is , while the Markov upper bound is and is vacuous for .
Depends on
- Bernoulli random variables and binomial random variables as sums of independent Bernoulli trials
- Pairwise and mutual independence of finite-valued random variables
- Expectation is linear for every finite family of random variables, without any independence hypothesis
- Indicators turn event probabilities, intersections, and finite counts into expectations and products
- Markov's inequality on a finite probability space
- The finite second-moment bound $\mathbb P(X\ne0)\ge\mathbb E[X]^2/\mathbb E[X^2]$ when $\mathbb E[X^2]>0$
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Y. Zhao, MIT 18.218 Probabilistic Method in Combinatorics, Chapter 3 (standard reference, not scraped)