How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A two-gap contact model changes its active set with the load
Statement
Consider the reduced two-gap variational inequality with stiffness : for a load , find such that for every . Its complementarity form is , , , and . The scaling matches The dual mortar contact system is stable and exactly complementary, where is the diagonal dual-pair weight and is the multiplier coefficient. For , both gaps are positive and no constraint is active. For , the second constraint alone is active, with and . This is an algebraic reduced model; the chosen matrix is not asserted to arise from a particular geometric mesh.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The complementarity sign convention of The dual mortar contact system is stable and exactly complementary and the matrix above.
The mortar stationarity pairs nodal reactions with the corresponding gap coordinates, and each coefficient and gap is nonnegative with zero product. (The dual mortar contact system is stable and exactly complementary)
Proof
The vectors and are eigenvectors of with eigenvalues and , so is symmetric positive definite. Also . For , the unconstrained solution is , which has positive entries, and . Thus every VI test has zero residual and the complementarity equations hold with . The scaling between and the mortar coefficient agrees with [F1].
For , take and compute , so . Both vectors are componentwise nonnegative and . For every , , so this is the VI solution with exactly the second gap active.
Let be the standard coordinate vectors and write . If , , and , then for every , , so the complementarity equations imply the VI. Conversely, suppose solves the VI. If , choose and test with and ; the two inequalities give and , hence . If , test with for any to get . Thus and for both coordinates, proving equivalence. If both solve the VI for the same load, testing with each other and adding gives . The eigenvalues computed in step 1.1 are positive, so is positive definite and this forces ; then is also unique. Thus the displayed complementarity solutions are the unique ones for their respective loads.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Rolf H. Krause and Barbara I. Wohlmuth, Multigrid Methods for Mortar Finite Elements, complete 7-page paper (standard reference, not scraped)