Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A two-gap contact model changes its active set with the load

Statement

Consider the reduced two-gap variational inequality with stiffness A=(2−1−12): for a load f∈R2, find g∈R+2 such that (Ag−f)⋅(z−g)≥0 for every z∈R+2. Its complementarity form is Ag−f=ρ, gi≥0, ρi≥0, and ρigi=0. The scaling ρi=diλi matches The dual mortar contact system is stable and exactly complementary, where di>0 is the diagonal dual-pair weight and λi is the multiplier coefficient. For f(1)=(1,1/5)T, both gaps are positive and no constraint is active. For f(2)=(1,−1)T, the second constraint alone is active, with g=(1/2,0)T and ρ=(0,1/2)T. This is an algebraic reduced model; the chosen matrix is not asserted to arise from a particular geometric mesh.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The complementarity sign convention of The dual mortar contact system is stable and exactly complementary and the matrix A above.

[F1]

The mortar stationarity pairs nodal reactions diλi with the corresponding gap coordinates, and each coefficient and gap is nonnegative with zero product. (The dual mortar contact system is stable and exactly complementary)

Proof

1.1F1givenalgebra

The vectors (1,1)T and (1,−1)T are eigenvectors of A with eigenvalues 1 and 3, so A is symmetric positive definite. Also A−1=13(2112). For f(1)=(1,1/5)T, the unconstrained solution is g=A−1f(1)=(11/15,7/15)T, which has positive entries, and Ag−f(1)=0. Thus every VI test has zero residual and the complementarity equations hold with ρ=0. The scaling between ρi and the mortar coefficient λi agrees with [F1].

1.2givenalgebra

For f(2)=(1,−1)T, take g=(1/2,0)T and compute Ag=(1,−1/2)T, so Ag−f(2)=(0,1/2)T=ρ. Both vectors are componentwise nonnegative and ρ1g1=0=ρ2g2. For every z∈R+2, ρ⋅(z−g)=ρ2z2≥0, so this is the VI solution with exactly the second gap active.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2givenalgebra∎

Let e1,e2 be the standard coordinate vectors and write r:=Ag−f. If g≥0, r≥0, and rigi=0, then for every z≥0, r⋅(z−g)=∑irizi−∑irigi=∑irizi≥0, so the complementarity equations imply the VI. Conversely, suppose g solves the VI. If gi>0, choose 0<t<gi and test with z=g+tei and z=g−tei; the two inequalities give ri≥0 and ri≤0, hence ri=0. If gi=0, test with z=g+tei for any t>0 to get ri≥0. Thus r≥0 and rigi=0 for both coordinates, proving equivalence. If g,g~ both solve the VI for the same load, testing with each other and adding gives −(g−g~)TA(g−g~)≥0. The eigenvalues computed in step 1.1 are positive, so A is positive definite and this forces g=g~; then ρ=Ag−f is also unique. Thus the displayed complementarity solutions are the unique ones for their respective loads.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources