How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The singular chain complex of a point
Example
Let be a one-point space. For each there is exactly one singular -simplex , so Moreover , and for
Hence , all higher singular homology groups vanish, and the reduced singular homology groups are zero in every degree.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The one-point space .
Reduced singular homology is defined from the augmentation kernel in degree (Augmentation at 0-simplices and reduced singular homology).
The singular boundary is the alternating sum of the face restrictions (The singular boundary operator).
Verification
Every map is the same constant map , so each chain group is free of rank one on . By [L2], , and for one has which is for odd and for even .
Therefore for even and for odd , so for all . Also . Since the augmentation of [L1] sends to , its kernel is , so the reduced degree-zero group also vanishes.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology (standard reference, not scraped)