How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Softened Newtonian particles do not specify the physical collision force
Example
For two Newtonian point masses in with positive constants absorbed into , the unsoftened relative acceleration is for , where is Euclidean. A softened model uses The softened field is smooth at a collision, but it defines a different dynamical model.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , and the two displayed force laws.
The norm is Euclidean (The Euclidean inner product on ).
Verification
Given: The unsoftened and softened force formulas in the Example.
For , their scalar denominators are and , which differ because . Thus for every nonzero .
At , the unsoftened formula is undefined, whereas the softened formula gives . The denominator is smooth and strictly positive, and is smooth for ; hence the softened field is on all of . Its smooth extension therefore supplies a convention for its own regularized model, not a collision law for the singular Newtonian system.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.