How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The cut is an irrational real number
Example
The set is a Dedekind cut (Dedekind cut), hence a real number (The real numbers as Dedekind cuts), yet no rational lies "at its boundary": it is the cut that names , the real number lacks. It is the canonical witness that cuts capture limits missing from , and the standard test case for the completeness of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The set , the cut axioms (C1)–(C3) (Dedekind cut), and as the set of all cuts with rational embedding (The real numbers as Dedekind cuts).
is a totally ordered field; in particular squaring is order-preserving on nonnegatives () and the usual rational arithmetic holds (The rationals form a totally ordered field).
No rational number squares to (FALSE: some rational number squares to 2).
Verification
(C1) since , so ; and since and , so .
(C2) Let and . If then by definition. Otherwise , so ; then forces , and gives , whence .
(C3, case ) Given with , take : then (as ) and , so .
(C3, case ) Given with , we have ; set . Then , so , while , so ; hence with .
(C3) Combining the two cases, every admits with : has no greatest element.
By steps 1.1, 1.2 and 2.1, satisfies (C1)–(C3); it is a Dedekind cut (Dedekind cut), i.e. a real number (The real numbers as Dedekind cuts).
Finally for every : were , then would give and , while is impossible by [L2], so ; as we have , and then satisfies and , so , yet puts , a contradiction. Thus is a cut represented by no rational: it is the cut that names , the real number absent from .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 25 results over 12 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 1 (Appendix: construction of ℝ) (standard reference, not scraped)
- E. Landau, Foundations of Analysis (standard reference, not scraped)
- Dedekind cut (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Math 331 course handout: Dedekind Cuts and Real Numbers (Hobart and William Smith Colleges) (standard reference, not scraped)
- M. Girotti, Addendum — Construction of $\mathbb{R}$ via Dedekind's method (MATH 317, Advanced Calculus of One Variable) (standard reference, not scraped)