Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passverified 2026-08-02 (claude-opus-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The cut S={q:q<0 or q2<2}S = \{q : q<0 \text{ or } q^2<2\} is an irrational real number

Example

The set S:={qQ:q<0 or q2<2}S := \{ q \in \mathbb{Q} : q < 0 \text{ or } q^2 < 2 \} is a Dedekind cut (Dedekind cut), hence a real number (The real numbers R\mathbb{R} as Dedekind cuts), yet no rational lies "at its boundary": it is the cut that names 2\sqrt{2}, the real number Q\mathbb{Q} lacks. It is the canonical witness that cuts capture limits missing from Q\mathbb{Q}, and the standard test case for the completeness of R\mathbb{R}.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The set S:={qQ:q<0 or q2<2}S := \{ q \in \mathbb{Q} : q < 0 \text{ or } q^2 < 2 \}, the cut axioms (C1)–(C3) (Dedekind cut), and R\mathbb{R} as the set of all cuts with rational embedding qq={rQ:r<q}q \mapsto q^\ast = \{ r \in \mathbb{Q} : r < q \} (The real numbers R\mathbb{R} as Dedekind cuts).

[L1]

Q\mathbb{Q} is a totally ordered field; in particular squaring is order-preserving on nonnegatives (0a<ba2<b20 \le a < b \Rightarrow a^2 < b^2) and the usual rational arithmetic holds (The rationals form a totally ordered field).

[L2]

No rational number squares to 22 (FALSE: some rational number squares to 2).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

(C1) 0S0 \in S since 02=0<20^2 = 0 < 2, so SS \ne \emptyset; and 2S2 \notin S since 2>02 > 0 and 22=4>22^2 = 4 > 2, so SQS \ne \mathbb{Q}.

givenL1
1.2

(C2) Let pSp \in S and q<pq < p. If q<0q < 0 then qSq \in S by definition. Otherwise 0q<p0 \le q < p, so p>0p > 0; then pSp \in S forces p2<2p^2 < 2, and 0q<p0 \le q < p gives q2<p2<2q^2 < p^2 < 2, whence qSq \in S.

givenL1
1.3

(C3, case q0q \le 0) Given qSq \in S with q0q \le 0, take r=1r = 1: then 1S1 \in S (as 12=1<21^2 = 1 < 2) and r=1>0qr = 1 > 0 \ge q, so r>qr > q.

givenL1
1.4

(C3, case q>0q > 0) Given qSq \in S with q>0q > 0, we have q2<2q^2 < 2; set r=2q+2q+2r = \dfrac{2q+2}{q+2}. Then rq=2q2q+2>0r - q = \dfrac{2 - q^2}{q+2} > 0, so r>q>0r > q > 0, while r22=2(q22)(q+2)2<0r^2 - 2 = \dfrac{2\,(q^2 - 2)}{(q+2)^2} < 0, so r2<2r^2 < 2; hence rSr \in S with r>qr > q.

givenL1algebra
2.1

(C3) Combining the two cases, every qSq \in S admits rSr \in S with r>qr > q: SS has no greatest element.

step 1.3step 1.4
3.1

By steps 1.1, 1.2 and 2.1, SS satisfies (C1)–(C3); it is a Dedekind cut (Dedekind cut), i.e. a real number (The real numbers R\mathbb{R} as Dedekind cuts).

step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1
4.1

Finally SpS \ne p^\ast for every pQp \in \mathbb{Q}: were S=p={r:r<p}S = p^\ast = \{ r : r < p \}, then pSp \notin S would give p>0p > 0 and p22p^2 \ge 2, while p2=2p^2 = 2 is impossible by [L2], so p2>2p^2 > 2; as p>0p > 0 we have p+2>0p + 2 > 0, and then s:=2p+2p+2s := \dfrac{2p+2}{p+2} satisfies 0<s<p0 < s < p and s2>2s^2 > 2, so sSs \notin S, yet s<ps < p puts sp=Ss \in p^\ast = S, a contradiction. Thus SS is a cut represented by no rational: it is the cut that names 2\sqrt{2}, the real number absent from Q\mathbb{Q}.

step 3.1L2algebra

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 25 results over 12 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources