Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A stable consistent explicit spectral-grid heat step

Example

Let X=c0(R) and let U(t) be the diagonal heat semigroup U(t)x=(exp⁡(−j2t)xj)j∈N from The diagonal heat semigroup on c0 is contractive and strongly continuous. For m≥1, let Gm=span⁡{e0,…,em−1}, where ej is the sequence with value 1 at coordinate j and 0 elsewhere. Index the scheme by ν∈N using m=ν+1. Give Gm the supremum norm, use the step size τm=m−2, and the explicit Euler update Qmej=(1−τmj2)ej(0≤j<m). Reconstruct by inclusion, restrict by coordinate truncation, and extend to the common space by the exact semigroup on the complementary coordinates, as in Finite-grid restriction, reconstruction, and common-space lift.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The common-space heat IVP, finite-grid lift, and family Qm in the example above.

[F1]

A common-space scheme uses one Banach space, a strongly continuous solution semigroup with a finite-time operator bound, and defines consistency, stability, and locally uniform-in-grid-time convergence in that same norm (Common Banach-space interface for a linear IVP and its time schemes).

[F2]

Given bounded Pm,Rm,Qm with PmRm=I and invariant ker⁡Pm, the common-space lift is Sm=RmQmPm+U(τm)(I−RmPm) (Finite-grid restriction, reconstruction, and common-space lift).

[F3]

On c0, the heat operators U(t)x=(exp⁡(−j2t)xj)j form a contractive strongly continuous semigroup (The diagonal heat semigroup on c0 is contractive and strongly continuous).

[F6]

Under DC and consistency on the dense invariant subspace, finite-time convergence is equivalent to finite-time stability (Lax equivalence for a common Banach-space scheme).

[F7]

The operator norm is the supremum over the unit ball, so a pointwise estimate ∥Tx∥≤∥x∥ gives ∥T∥op≤1 (The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum).

[F8]

A property true at 0 and preserved by successor holds for every n∈N (The principle of mathematical induction).

Verification

1.1F3F4construct

Let D be the finite-support sequences. By [F4], D is dense in X; it is invariant under U(t) because U(t) multiplies coordinates and does not add support. The heat IVP and its finite-time bound are supplied by [F3].

1.2F2F3F7construct

Since m=ν+1, τm=m−2>0 and τm→0 as ν→∞. Let Pm be truncation to coordinates 0,…,m−1 and Rm inclusion. Their norms are at most 1 by the coordinate supremum estimates and at least 1 by testing e0, so both have norm 1 by [F7]. Also PmRm=IGm and ker⁡Pm is invariant under U(τm) because U is diagonal. The finite maximum Lm:=max⁡0≤j<m∣1−τmj2∣ bounds every diagonal multiplier, so ∥Qmg∥∞≤Lm∥g∥∞ and Qm is bounded. Thus [F2] defines the common-space step Sm.

2.1F2F3F7F8step 1.2algebra

For j<m, 0≤1−j2/m2≤1; on coordinates j≥m the lift uses the multipliers exp⁡(−j2/m2)∈(0,1] from [F3]. Hence every coordinate multiplier of Sm lies in [0,1]. Therefore ∥Smx∥∞≤∥x∥∞ for every x∈c0, and [F7] gives ∥Sm∥op≤1. The bound ∥Smnx∥∞≤∥x∥∞ holds at n=0; if it holds at n, applying the contraction estimate to Smnx proves it at n+1. Induction [F8] gives it for every n, and then [F7] gives ∥Smn∥op≤1. The family is stable on every finite time interval.

2.2F3F5step 1.2algebrachoose

Fix v∈D, supported in coordinates 0,…,N. For m>N, direct evaluation and 0<exp⁡(−rτmj2)≤1 give max⁡r∈Nrτm≤T∥(Sm−U(τm))U(rτm)v∥∞τm≤∥v∥∞max⁡0≤j≤N∣1−τmj2−exp⁡(−τmj2)∣τm. For j=0 the quotient is zero. For each fixed 1≤j≤N, put z=τmj2; [F5] gives ∣1−z−exp⁡(−z)∣τm=j2∣1−exp⁡(−z)z−1∣→0, because the quotient tends to exp⁡′(0)=1 as z→0. The maximum of these finitely many quotients tends to zero: for any tolerance choose a threshold for each j (or use threshold 1 if there is no positive j), then take the largest threshold. Multiplication by the fixed ∥v∥∞ preserves this limit. The bound is independent of r, so the family is consistent on D.

3.1F1F3F4F6A1step 2.1step 2.2∎

By [F6] and the explicit DC assumption [A1], this consistent stable family converges to the heat semigroup in the common supremum norm, uniformly over grid times in each bounded time interval.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

46 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources