Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A two-cell SUPG mesh misses the interior shape of an outflow layer

Example

Take b>0, ϵ>0, f=0, and endpoint data u(0)=0, u(1)=1. On the two-cell mesh h=1/2, the exact-parameter P1 SUPG solution has the exact nodal value at x=1/2. Nevertheless, at a fixed point inside the outflow cell its error tends to 0.98 as ϵ↓0. The example separates nodal fitting from resolution of the layer inside an element.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The model on (0,1) with b>0, ϵ>0, f=0, endpoint values 0,1, two equal cells, and the exact parameter τ from the one-dimensional SUPG form.

[F1]

One-dimensional stationary convection–diffusion model and uniform P1 space: the equation is −ϵu′′+bu′=f, the two-cell P1 trial function is continuous with the prescribed endpoint values, and Pe=bh/(2ϵ) for b>0.

[F2]

One-dimensional residual SUPG form with the exact cell parameter: ah(wh,vh)=ϵ(wh′,vh′)+b(wh′,vh)+τb2(wh′,vh′), with the corresponding residual-weighted load, and τ=h(2b)−1(coth⁡(Pe)−Pe−1) for b>0.

[F3]

The one-dimensional SUPG parameter is positive and bounded: the reference parameter τ is strictly positive.

Verification

1.1F1givenalgebra

Put r=b/ϵ. The function u(x)=(erx−1)/(er−1) has endpoint values 0,1, and −ϵu′′+bu′=(−ϵr2+br)erx/(er−1)=0. Hence it is the exact solution.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra

Let ϕ be the P1 hat function at x=h=1/2, let χh∈Sh(0,1) have nodal values (0,0,1), and write uh=Uϕ+χh. Put D=ϵ+τb2>0 by [F3]. Since ϕ′=1/h on the left cell and −1/h on the right, ∫01(ϕ′)2dx=2/h and ∫01ϕ′ϕ dx=12[ϕ2]01=0, so ah(ϕ,ϕ)=2D/h. Also χh′=0 on the left and 1/h on the right, giving D∫χh′ϕ′=−D/h and b∫χh′ϕ=b/h∫h1ϕ=b/2. Thus ah(χh,ϕ)=−D/h+b/2 and the one interior equation is D(2U−1)/h+b/2=0. By [F2] and the Péclet formula in [F1], D=ϵ+(bh/2)(coth⁡(Pe)−1/Pe)=(bh/2)coth⁡(Pe), so U=(1−tanh⁡(Pe))/2=1/(e2Pe+1). The exact value u(h)=(ebh/ϵ−1)/(e2bh/ϵ−1) is the same number because 2Pe=bh/ϵ.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

At x=0.99, the piecewise-linear value is uh(0.99)=0.98+0.02U, which tends to 0.98 as ϵ↓0. The exact value is (e0.99b/ϵ−1)/(eb/ϵ−1), which tends to zero because b>0 and 0.99<1. Therefore the pointwise error tends to 0.98. The exact midpoint node does not resolve the exponential layer inside the final cell.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · one level

3 results within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources