Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Positive pair covariances and a negative SYG estimate

Example

Let U={1,2,3,4} and use the fixed-size design pd({1,2})=pd({3,4})=25,pd({1,3})=pd({1,4})=pd({2,3})=pd({2,4})=120. All units have πi=1/2. The pair differences are Δ12=Δ34=3/20>0 and Δij=−1/5 for the four cross pairs. Thus a positive pair difference does not force a negative Sen–Yates–Grundy (SYG) estimate for every fixed population: for y=(0,0,1,1) all six sample estimates are nonnegative. But for y=(0,1,0,0) the supported sample {1,2} produces the negative estimate −3/2, even though the true design variance is 1. In both schedules the SYG estimates average to the corresponding true variance.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The six two-unit samples and their probabilities are as stated, with fixed population values chosen separately for each schedule.

[F1]

Finite populations and sampling designs: A sampling design is a finite support of subsets with positive weights summing to one; πi and πij are the first- and second-order inclusion probabilities.

[F2]

Inclusion-covariance difference: Δij=πij−πiπj.

[F3]

Sen–Yates–Grundy variance identity: For fixed sample size and positive first-order inclusion probabilities, the SYG sample estimate is unbiased when all πij>0; pairwise nonpositive distinct-unit Δij is a sufficient guarantee of nonnegative sample estimates.

Verification

1.1givenF1F2algebra

The six weights sum to 2(2/5)+4(1/20)=1 and every sample has size two; each unit's incident weights sum to 1/2, so πi=1/2. Pair probabilities are π12=π34=2/5 and 1/20 for cross pairs; by [F2], Δ12=Δ34=2/5−1/4=3/20 and Δij=1/20−1/4=−1/5 for cross pairs. All πij are positive.

2.1F1F3step 1.1algebra

For yA=(0,0,1,1), x=(0,0,2,2). Samples {1,2} and {3,4} give SYG estimate zero; each cross sample gives −Δij(xi−xj)2/πij=16. The six estimates are 0,0,16,16,16,16 and have expectation 4(1/20)(16)=16/5. HT totals are 0,4,2 with probabilities 2/5,2/5,1/5, so their mean is 2 and variance is (2/5)4+(2/5)4=16/5.

3.1F1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

For yB=(0,1,0,0), x=(0,2,0,0). The HT total is 2 or 0 with probability 1/2 each, so its variance is 1. Sample {1,2} has probability 2/5 and SYG estimate −Δ12(x1−x2)2/π12=−(3/20)(4)/(2/5)=−3/2; samples {2,3} and {2,4} have estimate 16 and the other three have zero. The expectation is (2/5)(−3/2)+2(1/20)(16)=1, equal to the variance despite the negative sample value; thus the nonpositive-Delta condition is sufficient but not necessary for all supported estimates to be nonnegative for a particular fixed population, as schedule yA in step 2.1 shows.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.