How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Counting the constant-size extended alphabet for a fixed nondeterministic machine
Example
Take a machine with tape alphabet and state set
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The fixed machine above.
For a fixed machine, the extended alphabet of one tableau cell is , by For a fixed machine, each tableau cell ranges over a constant-size extended alphabet.
Verification
The bare tape-symbol options contribute the three symbols . The state-tagged options contribute one pair for each and , so there are such tagged symbols.
By [L1], the total extended alphabet size is therefore , independent of the input length. This is the concrete constant hidden in the general lemma.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- MIT 18.404J / 6.840J, Lecture 16: Cook-Levin Theorem (standard reference, not scraped)