How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A canonical map between two bracketings of a five-fold product
Example
Take the two parenthesisations A canonical map is obtained by associators alone.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Objects of a monoidal category.
Between any two parenthesisations of one ordered tensor word there is a unique canonical natural isomorphism (Mac Lane coherence in canonical-map form).
Verification
Apply the outer associator to obtain .
Apply to the result of step 1.1 and get .
The composite of steps 1.1 and 2.1 is therefore a canonical map . Any other chain of associators with the same endpoints is equal to it by [L1].
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- P. Etingof, S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik, Tensor Categories, Chapter 2.9 (standard reference, not scraped)