Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-16
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite directed paths form the free category on a quiver

Example

A small quiver consists of sets Q0 of vertices and Q1 of directed edges with source and target maps s,t:Q1→Q0. Its free category P(Q) has vertices as objects and finite composable edge paths as morphisms. The empty path is an identity and path concatenation is composition. This construction is left adjoint to the functor sending a small category to its underlying quiver.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A small quiver Q and a small category C.

[F1]

A category has associative composition and a two-sided identity at each object; its object class may be empty (Category, object, morphism, domain, codomain, identity, composition, and hom-collection).

[F2]

If a property holds at 0 and passes from n to n+1, then it holds for every natural number (The principle of mathematical induction).

[L1]

A natural bijection D(Fc,d)≅C(c,Gd) presents F as left adjoint to G in locally small categories (Under local smallness, transposition gives the natural hom-set bijection, and conversely).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1construct

A path of length n is a composable n-tuple of edges. Concatenation of paths is associative, and the length-zero path at a vertex is a two-sided identity. Thus these data form a category P(Q) by [F1], including when Q0 is empty.

2.1F1step 1.1construct

Given a quiver map q:Q→U(C), define q^:P(Q)→C on vertices by q and on a path by composing the images of its edges in order; send an empty path to the appropriate identity. Associativity in [F1] makes this a functor.

2.2step 1.1F1construct

For a quiver map f=(f0,f1):Q→Q′ define P(f):P(Q)→P(Q′) by f0 on objects and by (e1,…,en)↦(f1e1,…,f1en) on paths; the image tuple is composable because f commutes with source and target. It sends empty paths to empty paths and concatenations to concatenations, so it is a functor, and P(1Q)=1P(Q) and P(gf)=P(g)P(f) hold componentwise. Thus P is a functor.

3.1step 2.1F2

Any functor extending q must have the values in step 2.1: induction on path length using [F2] forces the empty path to an identity and each longer path to the composite of its edge images. Hence the extension is unique.

4.1step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1L1∎

Both Quiv and Cat here consist of small quivers and small categories, so a quiver map is a pair of functions between sets and a functor is a pair of functions between sets; each morphism collection is a subset of a set of functions and hence a set, making both categories locally small as [L1] requires. Restriction to vertices and edges and the extension q↦q^ are inverse by steps 2.1 and 3.1, and they commute with the actions of step 2.2 and with postcomposition by functors, so the bijection Cat(P(Q),C)≅Quiv(Q,U(C)) is natural and [L1] yields P⊣U.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources