How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The hexagon checked for cartesian products
Example
For cartesian products, both routes around the first braiding hexagon send to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A category with finite products and its cartesian swap braiding.
The cartesian swap maps form a braiding (The cartesian swap braiding is a symmetry).
Verification
Write the source of the first hexagon as and evaluate the left-hand route on . The inner swap sends to after the evident rebracketing.
Evaluate the right-hand route: first swap past , then swap past . The result is again after the same rebracketing identifications.
Since the two routes agree on every triple , the first hexagon commutes in this cartesian case. The second hexagon is checked by the same coordinate calculation with the factors regrouped as .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- P. Etingof, S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik, Tensor Categories, Example 8.2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)