How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The inverse contour formula recovers a local inverse value
Example
Let , let , and let satisfy . Let be the square root of with positive real part. Then has exactly one simple solution inside , namely
and the inverse contour formula gives
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The function , the circle , and a complex number with .
If a contour encloses exactly one simple preimage of , the inverse contour formula recovers it (A contour formula for a locally single-valued holomorphic inverse).
Verification
On the circle one has So Rouché's theorem applied to and shows that has exactly one zero inside .
The two roots of are . Since , one has , so Therefore So the unique zero inside is .
If and , then , so the enclosed zero is simple. The positively oriented circle winds once around every point of , so the hypotheses of [L1] are satisfied and the inverse contour formula gives
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Guide to Cultivating Complex Analysis, §5.4 (standard reference, not scraped)