How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Differentiating the inverse of a matrix reproduces the closed formula entrywise
Example
Take
Then
The direct first-order expansion of has the same linear term.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The displayed matrices and .
On the invertible locus, (On the invertible locus, ).
Verification
Since , one has Also direct multiplication gives .
Step 1.1 shows that the coefficient of in the exact inverse expansion is , which is exactly . This matches [L1] entry by entry.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Alan Edelman and Steven G. Johnson, Matrix Calculus for Machine Learning and Beyond (standard reference, not scraped)