How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The divisor-sum identity at , finds exactly two monic irreducible cubics
Example
Over the divisor-sum identity ( for the counts of monic irreducibles of degree over ) at reads
and , so . The two monic irreducible cubics in are
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The field with two elements and the counts of monic irreducible polynomials of degree in (Degree, leading coefficient and monic polynomial, with the zero polynomial having no degree).
for every , the sum over the positive divisors of ( for the counts of monic irreducibles of degree over , Divisibility in : when for some integer ).
A polynomial of degree or over a field is irreducible if and only if it has no root in that field (A polynomial of degree two or three over a field is irreducible exactly when it has no root in the field).
For a commutative ring , and : if and only if divides (Factor theorem over a commutative ring, Evaluation and roots of a polynomial in a commutative target ring).
Verification
The monic polynomials of degree one in are and , and each is irreducible, having degree one; so .
A monic cubic over is with , so there are eight of them. Such an has no root in exactly when and , that is exactly when and .
The positive divisors of are and , so [L1] at and reads ; with step 1.1 this gives and .
The pairs with in are and , so exactly two monic cubics have no root in , namely and ; by [L2] these two are irreducible and by [L2] and [L3] the other six are not, each having a root and hence a linear factor. This agrees with the count of step 2.1.
Remarks
- The identity is a recursion, not a formula. It determines only because is already known; at it would read and would need first.
Depends on
- $\sum_{d\mid n}d\,N_q(d)=q^{n}$ for the counts $N_q(d)$ of monic irreducibles of degree $d$ over $\mathbb F_q$
- A polynomial of degree two or three over a field is irreducible exactly when it has no root in the field
- Factor theorem over a commutative ring
- Degree, leading coefficient and monic polynomial, with the zero polynomial having no degree
- Evaluation and roots of a polynomial in a commutative target ring
- Divisibility in $\mathbb{Z}$: $d \mid a$ when $a = dq$ for some integer $q$
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- K. Conrad, Roots and Irreducibles (expository blurb), Example 6.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- K. Conrad, Finite Fields (expository blurb), Section 6 (standard reference, not scraped)