How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The permutation representation on the left cosets
Example
Let be a field, let be a finite group, and let . Left multiplication on the coset set gives a permutation representation of on the vector space .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , a finite group , and a subgroup .
The left cosets are the subsets of (Left and right cosets and of a subgroup).
A finite -set gives a permutation representation on the free vector space with that basis (The trivial representation, the regular representation, and permutation representations from finite -sets).
Verification
For , left multiplication sends the coset to , so acts on the finite set by .
By [L2], the induced representation on the basis vectors of is . So the matrix of in this basis is a permutation matrix recording the induced permutation of the cosets.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory, Example 4.3.4 (standard reference, not scraped)