How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The split extension as the zero cocycle
Example
When , the twisted product is the semidirect product , so it represents the zero class in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A group , an abelian -module , and the zero function .
The twisted product uses the multiplication (Twisted product extension from a two-cocycle).
The zero class corresponds exactly to split extensions (The zero H^2 class is equivalent to splitting).
Verification
With , [F1] becomes which is the usual semidirect-product law on .
The section is then a homomorphism, so the extension splits. By [L1], this is precisely the zero class in .
Therefore the zero cocycle gives the split extension.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Clara Loh, Group Cohomology, SS 2019 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Caroline Lassueur, Cohomology of Groups, SS 2021 (standard reference, not scraped)