How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A zero-differential complex has homology equal to each term
Example
Let be a chain complex whose every differential is zero. Then for every .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A chain complex with for all .
The zero complex and zero differentials are legitimate chain-complex data (Zero complex and stalk complex).
Homology is the quotient (Homology object of a chain complex).
The identity of an object is a kernel of the zero map out of it, and also is a cokernel of the zero map into it (The cokernel of the zero map out of the zero object is the target, and dually for kernels).
Verification
Since , [L3] identifies the cycle inclusion with , so . Likewise the image of is the zero object, so the boundary object is .
Substituting those identities into [L2] gives
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, Chapter 1 of An Introduction to Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)