How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Thue's collision argument gives
Example
The prime has . Thue's collision construction with the square produces the representation
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The prime and the residue .
If is prime and , then there are nonzero integers with and (Thue's lemma on small nonzero representatives).
A representation of a nonnegative integer as a sum of two squares is an ordered pair such that (Representations and primitive representations as sums of two squares).
Verification
One has , and , so the maximal integer with is .
In the map on , the distinct pairs and collide because . Their coordinate differences are , exactly as in [L1].
The bounds give , and step 2.1 together with makes the sum divisible by . Directly, , so is a representation in the sense of [F1].
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- P. Hackman, Elementary Number Theory, Chapter E, Example E.I.4 (standard reference, not scraped)