Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Total Stiefel–Whitney class of a sum of universal lines

Example

Assume AC and let n0. On (RP)n let Li=priγ1 be the pullback of the universal real line along the i-th projection and put ai=w1(Li). Then H((RP)n;F2)=F2[a1,,an],L1Ln has w(i=1nLi)=i=1n(1+ai), and wk(iLi) is the k-th elementary symmetric polynomial σk(a1,,an); for n=0 the product is 1 on a point.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, n0, the product (RP)n with its coordinate projections, and the pullback lines Li.

[F1]

H(RP;F2)=F2[a] with a=1 (Mod-two cohomology ring of infinite real projective space).

[F2]

Under AC, with R=F2 a PID and every homology group finite free (each Hq(RP;F2) is a copy of F2), the cross product is a graded-ring isomorphism H(X)F2H(Y)H(X×Y) (Cohomological Kunneth cross product is a ring isomorphism).

[F3]

The total class of the universal line is w(γ1)=1+a (Stiefel–Whitney class of the universal real line).

[F4]

Stiefel–Whitney classes are natural and satisfy the Whitney product formula w(EF)=w(E)w(F) (Naturality of Stiefel–Whitney classes, Whitney sum formula for Stiefel–Whitney classes).

[A1]

AC is the Axiom of Choice in the form fixed by The Axiom of Choice.

Verification

1.1

The cohomology ring is polynomial. By [F2] applied to the n-fold product and [F1], the cross product identifies H((RP)n;F2) with the n-fold graded tensor product of F2[a], which is the polynomial ring F2[a1,,an] under the identifications ai=pria. The construction is by iterated Künneth over the finite product, and each factor's homology is F2 in each degree, so the finite-freeness hypothesis of [F2] holds factor by factor.

F1F2
2.1

The total class of the sum. Each Li=priγ1 is a line bundle, so naturality [F4] applied to the universal computation [F3] gives w(Li)=priw(γ1)=1+pria=1+ai. The Whitney product formula [F4] applied to the finite sum gives w(L1Ln)=i=1n(1+ai) in F2[a1,,an].

F3F4step 1.1
3.1

The individual classes. Expanding the product in the polynomial ring, the coefficient of degree k is the sum of all products of k distinct variables, that is the elementary symmetric polynomial σk(a1,,an); the coefficient of degree zero is 1=w0. Since the ai are algebraically independent by step 1.1, each σk is nonzero for kn, which is the standard algebraic-independence input used to see that a rank-n bundle can have all n positive classes nonzero.

step 1.1step 2.1
4.1

Boundary cases. For n=0 the product is a point, the empty sum of lines is the zero bundle, the empty product is 1, and w(0)=1 by the rank-zero convention. For n=1 the statements reduce to w(γ1)=1+a and σ1=a. The polynomial ring is commutative, so the order of the factors does not matter, and the displayed class is independent of the chosen ordering of the coordinates. AC is used through Künneth and the Whitney formula, as recorded.

F2F3F4A1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources