How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Full and truncated counting differ for a power map
Example
Let be an integer, and . Then while . In particular the full count strictly exceeds the truncated count, and holds with every term explicit.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer , the function and a radius .
Counting conventions: is the multiplicity of the zero of in , and (Counting, chordal proximity and characteristic).
Truncated counts: counts the distinct zeros once, weights each zero by local degree minus one, and , use the same centre-regularized integral as ; moreover (Truncated value and ramification counts).
For a rational function of degree , (Rational functions are exactly those with logarithmic characteristic).
Verification
The function has exactly one zero, at , of order . Hence for every : , and .
Centre regularisation of the first count: , so for every .
For the truncated counts the centre values are and respectively, so and .
Consistency: , in agreement with ; and because and .
The rational degree of is , so [F3] gives ; thus while the truncated count is smaller by . The truncated count omits the weight of the multiple zero. Replacing the full count by the truncated count in the First Main Theorem therefore changes its equality by this unbounded term. In a Second Main Theorem inequality with truncated counts on the right, replacing them by the larger full counts preserves the inequality but gives a weaker bound.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Goldberg–Ostrovskii, Value Distribution of Meromorphic Functions (standard reference, not scraped)
- I. Laine, Complex Analysis III lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)