How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A rational number has exactly two finite regular continued-fraction expansions
Example
The rational number has the two finite regular continued-fraction expansions and the normalized one is because its last digit is at least .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The rational number .
Every rational number has a unique normalized finite regular continued fraction, and exactly one other finite expansion obtained by splitting the last digit into (Normalized finite regular continued fractions are unique).
Verification
Direct calculation gives. [given, algebra]
Likewise. [F1, step 1.1, algebra] so the same rational has two finite expansions. The last digit of is , so [F1] identifies it as the normalized one and shows there are no further finite expansions.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter Hackman, Elementary Number Theory (standard reference, not scraped)
- William Stein, Elementary Number Theory: Primes, Congruences, and Secrets (standard reference, not scraped)