Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Two-point finite-metric transport

Example

Let X={x1,x2} have metric distance d(x1,x2)=δ>0. For a,b∈[0,1], let p=(a,1−a) and q=(b,1−b). Then W1(p,q)=δ∣a−b∣. If a≥b, one attaining coupling is

π=(ba−b01−a)

and one attaining normalized potential is f=(0,−δ). If b>a, one attaining coupling and potential are

π=(a0b−a1−b),f=(0,δ).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The two-point metric space, probability vectors, and parameter bounds in the Example.

[F1]

A coupling is a nonnegative matrix with the stated row and column sums, and W1 is its minimum transport cost (Couplings of finite probability vectors, The finite-metric 1-Wasserstein transport cost).

[F2]

The minimum coupling cost equals the maximum over normalized vectors satisfying ∣fi−fj∣≤d(xi,xj); both extrema are attained (Finite-metric transport duality and complementary slackness).

Verification

1.1givenF1constructalgebra

If a≥b, all entries of the displayed matrix are nonnegative, its row sums are b+(a−b)=a and 1−a, and its column sums are b and (a−b)+(1−a)=1−b. Its cost is δ(a−b). If b>a, the second displayed matrix has nonnegative entries, row sums a and (b−a)+(1−b)=1−a, column sums a+(b−a)=b and 1−b, and cost δ(b−a). Thus in either case it is a feasible coupling of cost δ∣a−b∣.

1.2givenF1algebra

If a≥b, the vector (0,−δ) is normalized and satisfies the Lipschitz constraint with equality; its objective is (b−a)(−δ)=δ(a−b). If b>a, the vector (0,δ) is normalized and feasible, and its objective is (b−a)δ=δ(b−a). Thus the displayed potential has value δ∣a−b∣ in either case.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2F2algebra∎

By [F2], the optimal primal and dual values coincide. The feasible plan in step 1.1 gives an optimal primal value at most δ∣a−b∣, while the feasible potential in step 1.2 gives an optimal dual value at least that number. Equality of the optima forces both displayed values to be optimal and gives W1(p,q)=δ∣a−b∣.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources