How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The uniform random variable on [0,1]
Example
Let with its Borel sets and uniform probability measure, and let . Then and
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The identity random variable on with uniform probability.
The cumulative distribution function is (Cumulative distribution function of a real random variable).
Expectation is integration against the probability measure, and for a nonnegative random variable the layer-cake formula computes it from the tail probabilities (Expectation of a nonnegative or integrable random variable, Layer-cake formulas for random variables).
Verification
By direct interval computation, which is exactly the displayed .
Direct integration gives
The tail is for and for , so in agreement with [L2].
Steps 1.1, 1.2, and 2.1 verify the CDF, moments, and tail integral.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jean-Francois Le Gall, Integration, Probabilities and Stochastic Processes, Section 8.1.5 (standard reference, not scraped)