How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Uniformisers and ideal arithmetic in a DVR
Example
Let be a discrete valuation ring. If and are uniformisers, then for a unit . For all integers ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A discrete valuation ring and two uniformisers .
A uniformiser generates the maximal ideal of a DVR (Uniformising parameters).
Every nonzero ideal of a DVR is a power of the maximal ideal (Ideals in a DVR are powers of the maximal ideal).
Verification
By [F1], both and generate the maximal ideal, so . Hence , say , and similarly . Multiplying gives , so in the domain and is a unit.
The sum is one of the two comparable ideals and , namely the larger one, so [L1] makes it . Likewise the intersection is the smaller one, namely .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- M. Mustata, Commutative Algebra, Remark 8.9 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, Discrete valuation rings after Example 20.1 (standard reference, not scraped)